Judicial activism refers to which of the following judicial philosophies?

Judicial activism is characterized by the philosophy that judges should interpret the Constitution and laws with consideration of contemporary social issues and values, rather than solely relying on the original intent of the framers or existing laws as they were written. This approach allows judges to adapt legal interpretations to modern societal conditions, potentially leading to rulings that advance social justice and address current challenges.

In this context, judicial activism often involves a willingness to strike down laws or government actions that are deemed inconsistent with evolving understandings of rights and protections. By interpreting legal texts in a manner that accounts for present-day circumstances, judges exercising judicial activism can play a crucial role in effecting social change and promoting justice in a dynamic society.